Experience Matters

Paul Cahill is an experienced medical malpractice lawyer with a proven track record of success.
Law books

Thorburn v Grimshaw – Summary Judgment Motion Granted for OBGYN

On January 15, 2024, the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia granted a motion for summary judgement brought by the Defendant, Dr. Robert Grimshaw (“Dr. Grimshaw”), a qualified medical practitioner trained in the specialties of gynecology and obstetrics, who performed a surgery on the Plaintiff, Daphne Thorburn (“Ms. Thorburn”), to remove a mass on her right ovary.

Read More »

McLean v. Valadka – Birth Control Stroke Claim Dismissed

On December 1, 2023, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a medical malpractice lawsuit brought by a young woman who suffered a stroke after taking birth control medication provided by her family physician who allegedly failed to advise her of the increased risk of stroke associated with that particular brand of birth control pill (Yaz).

Read More »
Law books

2023 in Review: Self Represented Litigants in Medical Malpractice

The successful prosecution of a medical malpractice lawsuit is challenging even for lawyers experienced in this complex area of the law. Given the high cost of litigation, it is typically only through contingency fee agreements that patients can afford representation. However, most experienced medical malpractice lawyers will be cautious in offering such agreements to only those plaintiffs who have the largest claims with the greatest prospects of success.

Read More »
Law books

Khaleel v Indar – No Informed Consent for Inguinal Hernia Repair

On September 29, 2023, the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta found general surgeon, Dr. Adrian Indar, negligent for failing to obtain informed consent from a 26 year-old man for an open inguinal hernia repair. Although the Court did not find the doctor negligent with respect to the procedure itself, the trial judge did conclude that Dr. Indar fell below the standard of care by not offering laparoscopic surgery as an alternative. If this had been offered, the patient would likely have chosen this procedure which would have prevented the vascular insult that caused an atrophied testicle and chronic pain.

Read More »