CPSO v. Kilian – Doctors’ Motion Refusing Medical Records Dismissed

Ontario Physicians and Surgeons Discipline Tribunal

On October 16, 2024, the Ontario Physicians and Surgeons Discipline Tribunal (“OPSDT”) of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (“CPSO”) dismissed the motions of two physicians, Dr. Rochagné Kilian and Dr. Sonja Sophia Kustka, who refused to produce medical records as part of an investigation into their COVID-19 vaccine exemption practice. 

The OPSDT dismissed their motions and ordered further hearings for both physicians to address finding and penalty (if applicable).

Background: Dr. Kilian

In September of 2021, two members of the public sent the CPSO copies of medical exemptions from the COVID-19 vaccine signed by Dr. Kilian.

The document did not explain a medical basis for the exemptions, claimed to cite legal authorities, including the Canadian Constitution and the Nuremberg Code and indicated it was based upon “MEDICAL, &/or PSYCHOSOCIAL CONDITION(S), [which] will be ongoing for a minimum of ten year(s).” The document also had an option for a medical exemption from wearing a mask. In addition, a member of the public sent an email with information about Dr. Kilian’s public comments on COVID-19 vaccines and the vaccine mandate.

Background: Dr. Kustka

The CPSO received two pieces of information about Dr. Kustka in November and December of 2021. First, a Girl Guide leader reported that she had received medical exemptions from mask requirements for two sisters written by Dr. Kustka, disclosing no medical basis for the exemptions. She stated that neither sister had reported any medical condition, nor did they live in proximity to Dr. Kustka’s office. Second, a member of the public filed a complaint regarding Dr. Kustka’s alleged use of ivermectin to treat her late mother, who had COVID-19.

The Doctors' Motion To Not Be Required To Produce Patient Medical Records Was Dismissed

The key issue raised in the case was of privacy and cooperation. The OPSDT dismissed the motion put forward by the doctors, citing their duty to collaborate with the CPSO in investigations. Further, it highlighted a crucial point that the physicians had no reasonable expectation of privacy in regards their patients’ medical records. Accordingly, it was stated that the s. 8 right against unreasonable search and seizure under the Charter did not apply in this context.

This ruling underscores the importance of cooperation with regulatory bodies. It further emphasized the necessity for effective investigations which are in the best interest of the public. The OPSDT conveyed a clear message that refusal to comply with regulatory bodies will not be tolerated and such actions may lead to severe consequences.

The decision also addressed several other pertinent issues, including challenges to the appointment of investigators, the application of policies, freedom of expression, and the constitutionality of vaccine mandates.

Recent Posts

McMaster Children's Hospital

Brown v. Meaney – Baby Girl Brain Injured, Failed to Receive Vitamin B6

On December 30, 2024, the Honourable Justice Michael Bordin of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice determined that two pediatric neurologists of McMaster Children’s Hospital (“MCH”) were negligent in the treatment of a newborn girl’s seizures which unfortunately resulted in a significant brain injury along with intellectual and development delay.

Read More »
Transesophageal Echocardiogram

Yang v. Freed – Patient’s Death Not Caused by Failure to Order TEE

On December 20, 2024, the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta dismissed a medical malpractice claim brought by the family of a 51 year-old woman who died 10 days after admission to the University of Alberta Hospital in Edmonton. The patient’s death occurred during a cardiac procedure to address an issue with her mitral heart valve. The trial was focused on the two critical care medicine specialists involved in her care at the material time. 

Read More »