Paul Cahill Medical Malpractice Lawyer https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html How to Choose a Medical Malpractice Lawyer in Ontario Massie v PHSA: An Imposter Nurse and the Limits of Class Certification Stroke Misdiagnosis in Ontario: Common Patterns and How Claims Are Proven Sheoran v Interior Health Authority: A Hospital’s Duty of Care to Its Medical Staff Gilmore v Love: A Mismanaged Labour and a Preventable Birth Injury Making a Complaint About Hospital Care in Ontario Paul Cahill Recognized by Best Lawyers in Canada CPSO v Karim: An OHIP Fraud and a Five-Month Licence Suspension CPSO v Iannantuono: A Boundary Violation Against a Hospital Coworker Martindale v Bahl: An Anal Cancer Claim Where the Standard of Care Was Met Beazley v Johnston: A Lyme Disease Claim Dismissed at Summary Judgment Thompson v Handler: An Emergency Discharge and a Missed Callback Thompson v Handler Trial Decision: Coverage in CP24 and the Brampton Guardian A Young Mother of Two, a Delayed Breast Cancer Diagnosis, and a Wrongful Death Settlement Veran v Derbyshire: A Late Defence Motion for a Neuropsychological Examination Khaleel v Indar: A Failure to Disclose a Reasonable Surgical Alternative CPSO v Trozzi: Findings of Both Misconduct and Incompetence Bad Doctor or Bad Genes? Genetic Defences in Medical Malpractice CPSO v Peirovy: A Failure to Comply with Practice Restrictions Leaving the ER Before Being Seen: The Legal Implications in Ontario Lal v Anderson: A Jury Notice Upheld in a Complex Birth Injury Case Cauda Equina Syndrome in Ontario: A Missed Diagnosis Profile Willick v Willard: An Appeal Dismissed With a Note on Trial Reasons Tripp v Ross: A Cancer Causation Defeat With Pain-and-Suffering Damages Hanson-Tasker v Ewart: The Limits of the Snell Adverse Inference 2023 in Review: Self-Represented Litigants in Medical Malpractice Paul Cahill in The Litigator: Expert Witness Qualification at Trial Sutherland v Booth: A Tragic Stroke Case Defeated on the Expert Evidence From Start to Finish: How to Ensure Your Expert is Permitted to Testify at Trial Scott v RHA: A Class Action Denied on Common Issues CPSO v Turek: A Two-Month Suspension for COVID-19 Misinformation McLean v Valadka: Informed Consent, Cryptogenic Stroke, and the Modified Objective Test Dumesnil v Jacob: When a General Surgeon Must Meet the Specialist Standard Thorburn v Grimshaw: Summary Judgment in an Informed Consent Case CPSO v Trozzi and Luchkiw: The Penalty Phase of COVID-19 Discipline Bendah v Fleming: When an Amniotic Fluid Embolism Defeats Causation Tookenay v O’Mahony Estate: When Late Service Defeats a Medical Malpractice Claim CPSO v Mercado: Breach of Patient Privacy and the Circle of Care Penate v Martoglio: A Discharged Jury, Inadequate Reasons, and a New Trial Causation in Claims of “Systemic” Medical Negligence: Levac v James A.G. v Rivera: Preterm Delivery Counselling and the Patient Who Declined Rybakov v Khattak: ECT Malpractice and the Expert Evidence Requirement Focken v Miller: Expert Evidence and the Foreseeable Risk Argument Kotorashvili v Lee: When a Surgeon Deviates from His Own Treatment Plan Coville Estate v Sellens: A Pneumonia Death and an ER That Met the Standard of Care CPSO v Li: Fee Misconduct and Unsupported Certifications Henry v Zaitlen: A Jury Verdict for Delayed Diagnosis of a Spinal Cord Fistula Denman v Radovanovic: Cumulative Risks and the Treatment Team’s Duty to Inform Cross-Examining the Defence Expert at the OBA Anatomy of a Trial Toronto Medical Malpractice Lawyer