Embolization

2 articles View all topics →

Case comment on Denman v Radovanovic, 2024 ONCA 276, on the cumulative risks doctrine for multi-step treatment, collective team responsibility for informed consent, and the modified objective causation test under Reibl v Hughes. By Paul Cahill, LSO Certified Specialist in Civil Litigation.

Denman v Radovanovic: Cumulative Risks and the Treatment Team’s Duty to Inform

The Ontario Court of Appeal affirmed liability against three physicians for failure to disclose the cumulative risks of a multi-step brain AVM treatment plan.

May 15, 2024

Case comment on Focken v Miller, 2024 BCCA 74, on expert evidence, the foreseeable risk argument, and the judicial humility doctrine in BC malpractice practice. By Paul Cahill, LSO Certified Specialist in Civil Litigation.

Focken v Miller: Expert Evidence and the Foreseeable Risk Argument

A widow’s appeal in a death after delayed embolization for a lingual artery pseudoaneurysm. The BC Court of Appeal affirmed dismissal on the standard of care.

March 26, 2024

Have a Case Like This?

Concerned about medical negligence?
Talk to Paul directly.

Free, confidential consultations. Paul reviews every potential case personally and tells you honestly whether it merits investigation.

Book a Consultation (416) 643-3845

Embolization

Denman v Radovanovic: Cumulative Risks and the Treatment Team’s Duty to Inform

Focken v Miller: Expert Evidence and the Foreseeable Risk Argument

Browse related areas

Concerned about medical negligence? Talk to Paul directly.

Concerned about medical negligence?
Talk to Paul directly.