Representing Victims of Medical Malpractice Across Ontario

Articles Tagged

Misdiagnosis

Misdiagnosis claims involve a clinically wrong diagnosis: the practitioner identified a condition, but identified the wrong one, and the patient was treated for the wrong condition or denied treatment for the right one. Misdiagnosis is distinct from failure to diagnose (where no diagnosis was made) and from delayed diagnosis (where the correct diagnosis was eventually made but reached too late).

Common contexts for misdiagnosis include cancer (where benign findings are read as malignant or the reverse), cardiac presentations (where myocardial infarction is misread as a non-cardiac condition or the reverse), stroke (where transient ischemic attack or full stroke is read as migraine, intoxication, or anxiety), and infection (where sepsis is read as a viral illness). Anchoring bias, where the first plausible diagnosis is held onto despite contradicting evidence, is a recurring theme in the academic and judicial literature on misdiagnosis.

The standard of care analysis in a misdiagnosis claim focuses on whether a reasonable practitioner in the same circumstances would have reached the same incorrect diagnosis. Causation focuses on the difference the correct diagnosis would have made to outcome, which is often the harder element to prove.

Posts tagged Misdiagnosis analyze Ontario decisions involving wrong-diagnosis fact patterns across multiple specialties.

9 articles View all topics →
Have a Case Like This?

Concerned about medical negligence?
Talk to Paul directly.

Free, confidential consultations. Paul reviews every potential case personally and tells you honestly whether it merits investigation.