
Liability Considerations in Surgical “Never Events” or Recognized Complication Cases
How surgical negligence claims succeed or fail. A 2026 OTLA Spring Conference paper on never events and recognized complication cases.
Representing Victims of Medical Malpractice Across Ontario
Surgical errors cover a range of negligent acts and omissions in connection with operative care, including wrong-site surgery, wrong-procedure surgery, retained foreign objects, failures of pre-operative assessment, intraoperative technical errors, failures of intraoperative monitoring, anaesthetic complications, and inadequate post-operative care. Delayed recognition of post-operative complications such as bowel perforation, internal bleeding, anastomotic leak, and compartment syndrome is a recurring theme in the case law.
The standard of care in surgery is specialty-specific. A general surgeon is not held to the standard of a vascular surgeon performing the same procedure, and a community-hospital surgeon is not held to the standard of a tertiary-care specialist. The standard is shaped by the relevant specialty’s training, guidelines, and prevailing practice, although in litigation it must be proven through expert evidence. Some surgical errors are categorized as “never events” because they should never occur with appropriate processes in place. Wrong-site surgery and retained foreign objects are the classic examples. Never events tend to attract direct institutional liability claims alongside individual practitioner claims, since they typically indicate systemic process failures.
Posts tagged Surgical Errors analyze Ontario decisions across multiple surgical specialties, with particular attention to the operative-record evidence, intraoperative decision making, and the timing of recognition of post-operative complications.

How surgical negligence claims succeed or fail. A 2026 OTLA Spring Conference paper on never events and recognized complication cases.

Most surgical errors are addressed through civil litigation and professional discipline. In rare cases, criminal liability can follow. An honest look at the threshold.

In Forget v Gibb, 2026 ONSC 626, the Ontario court dismissed a surgical negligence claim and delivered a sharp critique of the plaintiff’s expert.

Hamilton Spectator coverage of the Hanans family’s $2.5 million lawsuit against Hamilton Health Sciences over the 2024 death of a four-year-old following routine pediatric tonsil surgery.

Ontario Superior Court finds gynecologic surgeon liable for unrecognized intraoperative bowel injury. The duty to inspect framework in laparoscopic surgery.

A settlement on behalf of a 40-year-old woman whose hysterectomy was described as uncomplicated but resulted in injuries to both ureters and chronic disability.

A surgeon was found liable for failing to disclose laparoscopic hernia repair as an alternative, even though the open repair he performed met the standard of care.

A patient’s guide to surgical malpractice in Ontario. The three phases of care, the evidentiary challenges, and what it takes to prove a viable claim.

A Manitoba decision in which a physician was found negligent without expert evidence, illustrating the narrow common-sense exception under ter Neuzen v Korn.

I represented the plaintiff in this surgical malpractice case. The trial judge found a breach of the standard of care, but the claim failed at causation.

Paul Cahill won a trial verdict in O’Neill-Renouf v Ibrahim where Justice Baltman found a urologist negligently injured the obturator nerve during a TVT procedure.

Paul Cahill settled a surgical negligence claim where ankle fracture surgery proceeded before the patient’s anticoagulation was properly reversed.
Free, confidential consultations. Paul reviews every potential case personally and tells you honestly whether it merits investigation.