Endovascular Thrombectomy

2 articles View all topics →

Case comment on Hasan v Trillium Health Centre, 2024 ONCA 586, on the evidentiary gap doctrine, the Snell v Farrell "robust and pragmatic" causation framework, the available treatments causation analysis in delayed-diagnosis cases, and the appellate affirmance of a plaintiff verdict for stroke malpractice. By Paul Cahill, LSO Certified Specialist in Civil Litigation.

Hasan v Trillium: When the Defendant’s Negligence Creates the Evidentiary Gap

The Court of Appeal affirmed plaintiff causation in a stroke malpractice case, holding that defendants cannot rely on evidentiary gaps their own negligence created.

August 13, 2024

Stroke Misdiagnosis in Ontario: Common Patterns and How Claims Are Proven

Roughly 9% of strokes are initially misdiagnosed in the emergency setting. A practical guide to how stroke claims are investigated and proven in Ontario.

August 8, 2023

Have a Case Like This?

Concerned about medical negligence?
Talk to Paul directly.

Free, confidential consultations. Paul reviews every potential case personally and tells you honestly whether it merits investigation.

Book a Consultation (416) 643-3845

Endovascular Thrombectomy

Hasan v Trillium: When the Defendant’s Negligence Creates the Evidentiary Gap

Stroke Misdiagnosis in Ontario: Common Patterns and How Claims Are Proven

Browse related areas

Concerned about medical negligence? Talk to Paul directly.

Concerned about medical negligence?
Talk to Paul directly.