Obstetrics

2 articles View all topics →

Case comment on Ibrahimova v Cavanagh, 2025 ONSC 1152 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice), motion decision denying defendant physicians' request for production of in-home security camera recordings in a catastrophic injury malpractice action arising from missed previable PROM and septic pregnancy loss. On the privacy versus relevance framework in civil discovery and the Stewart v Kempster line. By Paul Cahill, LSO Certified Specialist in Civil Litigation.

Ibrahimova v Cavanagh: In-Home Recordings, Privacy, and the Limits of Defence Discovery

Ontario court denies defendant doctors’ motion for in-home security camera recordings in catastrophic injury malpractice action. Privacy prevails over relevance.

April 17, 2025

Midwifery Malpractice: Scope of practice, consultation duties, and birth injury claims in Ontario. A patient's guide by Paul Cahill, LSO Certified Specialist in Civil Litigation.

Birth Injury Claims Involving Midwives in Ontario

A patient’s guide to midwifery malpractice in Ontario. Scope of practice, consultation duties, the liability framework, and the most common claim categories.

October 14, 2024

Have a Case Like This?

Concerned about medical negligence?
Talk to Paul directly.

Free, confidential consultations. Paul reviews every potential case personally and tells you honestly whether it merits investigation.

Book a Consultation (416) 643-3845

Obstetrics

Ibrahimova v Cavanagh: In-Home Recordings, Privacy, and the Limits of Defence Discovery

Birth Injury Claims Involving Midwives in Ontario

Browse related areas

Concerned about medical negligence? Talk to Paul directly.

Concerned about medical negligence?
Talk to Paul directly.