Gilmore v Love: A Mismanaged Labour and a Preventable Birth Injury
A BC trial judge found an obstetrician 85% liable and obstetrical nurses 15% liable for skull fractures and brain damage caused during a difficult caesarean section.
Insights & Analysis
Informed.
Informed.
Equipped.
Empowered.
Plain-language insight on medical malpractice law in Ontario. Practical guidance, case analysis, and updates from a trial-focused practice. No legal jargon. No marketing fluff. Just what you need to know.
Browse by Topic
Articles on this site are for general information only and do not constitute legal advice. Reading articles does not create a lawyer-client relationship.
Sheoran v Interior Health Authority: A Hospital’s Duty of Care to Its Medical Staff
A psychiatrist was seriously assaulted by a patient. The BC Court of Appeal confirmed that hospitals owe a duty of care to medical staff, and that the standard is contextual.
Stroke Misdiagnosis in Ontario: Common Patterns and How Claims Are Proven
Roughly 9% of strokes are initially misdiagnosed in the emergency setting. A practical guide to how stroke claims are investigated and proven in Ontario.
Massie v PHSA: An Imposter Nurse and the Limits of Class Certification
A BC court certified a class action against a hospital that allegedly hired an imposter nurse. Some causes of action were certified; others were left to individual claims.
How to Choose a Medical Malpractice Lawyer in Ontario
A practical guide to choosing a medical malpractice lawyer in Ontario. Specialization, trial experience, clinical depth, credentials, and honest case screening.
Coville Estate v Sellens: A Pneumonia Death and an ER That Met the Standard of Care
A trial judge dismissed a medical malpractice claim against two ER physicians, finding the standard of care was met and that earlier testing would not have changed the outcome.
CPSO v Phillips: Online Misinformation, Witness Intimidation, and Revocation
A Northern Ontario physician’s certificate of registration was revoked for online misinformation, sharing of confidential investigative information, and clinical deficiencies.
CPSO v Kadri: Disruptive Conduct, Incompetence, and the Limits of Remediation
A Windsor nephrologist’s certificate of registration was revoked after findings of professional misconduct and incompetence. He was ordered to pay $250,510 in costs.
CPSO v Luchkiw: The Duty to Cooperate with a College Investigation
A family physician refused to cooperate with multiple CPSO investigations during the pandemic. The OPSDT held that the refusal was itself professional misconduct.