Representing Victims of Medical Malpractice Across Ontario

Insights & Analysis

Informed.
Equipped.
Empowered.

Plain-language insight on medical malpractice law in Ontario. Practical guidance, case analysis, and updates from a trial-focused practice. No legal jargon. No marketing fluff. Just what you need to know.

Articles on this site are for general information only and do not constitute legal advice. Reading articles does not create a lawyer-client relationship.

Read the Latest
Navy title card reading "JB v Bailey" with the subtitle "Admitted negligence, but causation was not proved", labelled Case Comment, from paulcahill.ca.

JB v Bailey: Admitted Negligence Is Not Proof of Causation in a Birth Injury Case

Dr. Bailey admitted that her management of labour was negligent and that it caused a hypoxic brain injury at birth. The plaintiffs still lost, because they could not prove that the brain injury caused the child’s lasting impairments. JB v Bailey is an Alberta decision, persuasive only in Ontario, but it is a clear reminder that admitted negligence and admitted injury are not the same as proven causation.

Navy title card reading "CPSO v Konasiewicz, Case Comment" with the line "A patient death, deficient technique, and a suspension," from paulcahill.ca

CPSO v Konasiewicz: A Patient Death, Deficient Technique, and a Suspension

A neurosurgeon practising pain medicine was suspended for six months after the tribunal found his chronic pain care fell below the standard of practice, his treatment of a patient who died after nerve blocks was deficient, and he breached a College order restricting his injections. A look at why a patient death led to remediation rather than revocation, and where the discipline process ends and a civil claim begins.

Navy title card reading "CPSO v Maharaj, Case Comment" with the line "Revocation after unconsented, non-evidence-based care," from paulcahill.ca

CPSO v Maharaj: A Revoked Licence, and What It Means For Patients

The Ontario Physicians and Surgeons Discipline Tribunal revoked Dr. Maharaj’s licence after finding his care of 17 patients fell below the standard of practice and that he was incompetent. A look at the consent, evidence-based-treatment and privacy findings, and what a discipline decision does and does not mean for an injured patient.