
CPSO v Karim: An OHIP Fraud and a Five-Month Licence Suspension
A family physician was suspended for five months after using OHIP fraudulently while resident in New York. Discipline for non-clinical conduct under the HPPC.
Representing Victims of Medical Malpractice Across Ontario
Plain-language insight on medical malpractice law in Ontario. Practical guidance, case analysis, and updates from a trial-focused practice. No legal jargon. No marketing fluff. Just what you need to know.
Articles on this site are for general information only and do not constitute legal advice. Reading articles does not create a lawyer-client relationship.

A family physician was suspended for five months after using OHIP fraudulently while resident in New York. Discipline for non-clinical conduct under the HPPC.

Paul Cahill has been recognized by Best Lawyers in Canada in the Medical Negligence practice area each year since 2021. A note on peer recognition in legal practice.

A practical guide to making a complaint about hospital care in Ontario, including the legislative framework, the disclosure rights you have, and how to get a substantive response.

A BC trial judge found an obstetrician 85% liable and obstetrical nurses 15% liable for skull fractures and brain damage caused during a difficult caesarean section.

A psychiatrist was seriously assaulted by a patient. The BC Court of Appeal confirmed that hospitals owe a duty of care to medical staff, and that the standard is contextual.

Roughly 9% of strokes are initially misdiagnosed in the emergency setting. A practical guide to how stroke claims are investigated and proven in Ontario.

A BC court certified a class action against a hospital that allegedly hired an imposter nurse. Some causes of action were certified; others were left to individual claims.

A practical guide to choosing a medical malpractice lawyer in Ontario. Specialization, trial experience, clinical depth, credentials, and honest case screening.

A trial judge dismissed a medical malpractice claim against two ER physicians, finding the standard of care was met and that earlier testing would not have changed the outcome.