
CPSO v Trozzi: Findings of Both Misconduct and Incompetence
A Northern Ontario ER physician was found guilty of misconduct and separately found incompetent for sustained COVID-19 misinformation across a two-year period.
Representing Victims of Medical Malpractice Across Ontario
The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) regulates the practice of medicine in the province under the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 and the Medicine Act, 1991. When concerns are raised about a physician’s conduct or competence, the matter is investigated by the College’s Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee, which may dismiss the complaint, issue a caution or remediation order, or refer the matter to the Ontario Physicians and Surgeons Discipline Tribunal for a hearing.
CPSO discipline outcomes range from advice and remediation, to public reprimand, to conditions on a certificate of registration, to suspension, to revocation. The most serious cases, including those involving sexual abuse, fraud, or clinical incompetence, are heard by the OPSDT and result in publicly reported decisions.
Discipline proceedings are regulatory and do not compensate patients. A patient who has suffered injury from negligent care must pursue a civil claim separately. CPSO and OPSDT findings can, however, be a useful source of information about a physician’s history and the regulator’s view of the relevant standard of practice.
Posts tagged CPSO Discipline analyze recent disciplinary outcomes affecting Ontario physicians, including the clinical context and the penalty imposed.

A Northern Ontario ER physician was found guilty of misconduct and separately found incompetent for sustained COVID-19 misinformation across a two-year period.

A general surgeon was suspended for 18 months after sexual misconduct against an ultrasound technician at his hospital, with a prior discipline history weighing heavily.

A family physician was suspended for five months after using OHIP fraudulently while resident in New York. Discipline for non-clinical conduct under the HPPC.

A Northern Ontario physician’s certificate of registration was revoked for online misinformation, sharing of confidential investigative information, and clinical deficiencies.

A Windsor nephrologist’s certificate of registration was revoked after findings of professional misconduct and incompetence. He was ordered to pay $250,510 in costs.

A family physician refused to cooperate with multiple CPSO investigations during the pandemic. The OPSDT held that the refusal was itself professional misconduct.

A clinical immunologist crossed professional boundaries with a 30-year patient and tried to procure a false alibi during the CPSO investigation that followed.

A defendant physician accessed his former patient’s hospital records during litigation. The Divisional Court remitted the CPSO disposition for reconsideration.
Free, confidential consultations. Paul reviews every potential case personally and tells you honestly whether it merits investigation.