Representing Victims of Medical Malpractice Across Ontario

Articles Tagged

Duty of Cooperation

The duty of cooperation refers to a regulated health professional’s obligation to cooperate with their College’s investigations and processes. A physician or other member who obstructs an investigation, fails to respond to lawful inquiries, withholds records, or misleads the regulator may face discipline for that conduct independently of the underlying concern that prompted the investigation.

In discipline proceedings, a failure to cooperate is frequently treated as a serious aggravating feature, because the regulatory system depends on candour and on members not impeding the College’s ability to protect the public. Allegations of this kind often appear alongside findings of professional misconduct and can influence the penalty imposed, including in cases that proceed by way of a joint submission on penalty.

Posts tagged Duty of Cooperation analyze Ontario discipline decisions in which a member’s cooperation, or lack of it, with the regulator was in issue.

4 articles View all topics →
Dark-blue banner with the title 'CPSO v Iracleous' and subtitle 'Revocation for false OHIP claims and a refusal to cooperate' indicating a legal case comment.

CPSO v Iracleous: Billing for Care He Never Provided, and Revocation

An emergency physician was struck off after billing OHIP $125,353 for services he never rendered, including critical care and cardioversions with no record they ever happened, and then refusing to cooperate with the College’s investigation. A look at why records integrity and the duty to cooperate sit at the centre of physician accountability.

Read More »
Have a Case Like This?

Concerned about medical negligence?
Talk to Paul directly.

Free, confidential consultations. Paul reviews every potential case personally and tells you honestly whether it merits investigation.